The Dore program, (previously referred to as the dyslexia dyspraxia Attention treatment) was founded by businessman Wynford Dore. His daughter, Sue has been diagnosed with severe dyslexia and after being told that there was no cure for such a condition, she became depressed, which led to several suicide attempts in her early twenties.
- Dore Program Exercises
- Dore Program Exercises
- Wynford Dore Program Exercises To Flattening
- Wynford Dore Exercises
How do you judge if an intervention is effective when you hear about it in the media? Perhaps you tot up the balance of opinions. Perhaps you do it unconsciously.
You might have noticed the Dore 'miracle cure' for dyslexia, invented by millionaire paint entrepreneur Wynford Dore. It's hard to ignore. In fact just recently you may have seen 'Strictly Come Dancing' star Kenny Logan - a rugby superhero, with 70 caps in 13 years - promoting the Dore Dyslexia Program with his own personal testimonials on the Jeremy Vine Show, Channel Five News, Radio Five Live, BBC London, ITV Central, ITV Yorkshire, in the Daily Mail, the Daily Record, Scotland on Sunday, and many, many more.
One earlier round of 'miracle cure' publicity was so bizarre that Nasa, which is quite busy making spacecraft, was forced to issue a press release refuting claims in the Independent and New Scientist that Dore used special Nasa space technology and exercises in the treatment (Dore denies involvement in these claims). And we should remember that the published scientific evidence for Dore consists of an infamous research study on the 'miracle cure', filled with fascinating methodological holes so serious that there were five resignations from the editorial board of the journal Dyslexia in protest at its publication, and an unprecedented nine critical commentaries from academics.
But in the media you will only ever see Dore being promoted intensely, glowingly, uncritically, with intimate personal testimonies which many, understandably, consider to constitute evidence. With repetition, after all, they can start to feel eerily quantitative.
- (#1) Below is the reference made in a research study published in the journal “Dyslexia” regarding the Learning Breakthrough Program™ (Belgau & Belgau, 1982) as the example given as the basis for the exercises of the Dore method).
- Dore Treatment Criticized Stephen Barrett, M.D. The Dore Program—originally called Dyslexia Dyspraxia Attention Treatment DDAT)—was originally developed by Wynford Dore, a businessman whose daughter was diagnosed with severe dyslexia . It is claimed to be effective against dyslexia, ADHD, Asperger's syndrome, and other learning difficulties.
- Wynford Dore Program Exercises: Software Free Download. 9/18/2016 0 Comments. The Dore method is a program for tackling a broad spectrum of learning difficulties and ADHD through exercises targeted at stimulating and improving the functioning of the cerebellum. Dore believes that the root cause of ADHD symptoms lies in the cerebellum.
- Wynford Newman Dore is a business person known for his Dore Programme. It is a treatment program specially made for individuals with dyslexia, developing sychronisation disorder, attention deficit disorder (), and also various other finding out troubles. The Dore program is about utilizing drug-free and also exercise-based training course of.
- The Dore treatment program was developed in 2000 in Britain by Wynford Dore. With the Dore program. I just found some of the basic exercises for the dore program. Wynford Dore Program Exercises. The Dore Program was created by businessman Wynford Dore as a drug free treatment for dyslexia.
And what shameless repetition. The Independent Television Commission upheld complaints about a Tonight With Trevor McDonald program promoting Dore's miracle cure (with an 'information line' at the end which went straight through to Dore). Nothing changed. A year later Richard and Judy did exactly the same thing, because there aren't any very good treatments for dyslexia, so anyone with a miracle cure is welcome on the sofa. The ITC upheld a complaint again. It changed nothing. Ofcom found Dore's TV advertisement to be in breach of its rules on evidence, 'assessment of medical claims', and 'impressions of professional advice and support'.
How do you make that kind of relentlessly positive media coverage happen? Dore retains Phil Hall Associates, headed by the ex-editor of the News of the World and one of the finest and most expensive PR men in Britain (he's quite a nice bloke on the phone). You may remember someone called Kenny Logan. He is paid for some of his promotional work for Dore, but he does not declare this fact to journalists or TV producers when he spreads his message of Dore miracles to the nation ('if journalists ask whether he is paid he confirms it,' says Dore, 'but he does not volunteer it when it does not seem an issue.').
You will never hear a negative Dore anecdote in the media. Why not? I spoke with three patients who felt the £2,000 programme didn't work for them. That's all. It's a fairly modest claim about their own experience, and you'd have thought the company might simply wear it. They asked for the names to discuss the cases specifically. I gave them two. In a letter to these patients asking for permission to talk about their cases they mentioned libel in a way that can only be described as threatening.
One was simply outraged. She thinks, incidentally, that the Dore Programme made her son's seizures and headaches worse. I make no comment on that, as it is simply one mother's story (but if Dore wants to live by extreme anecdotes, then that is one for them to think about). The other felt he dared not take the risk of speaking out - of simply saying 'it didn't work for me' - as he felt so threatened, he does not have the resources to protect himself legally.
An academic has received a letter threatening legal action, delivered in person to her home, for daring to speak about her concerns over the evidence for Dore when asked by journalists. Dore's lawyers have sent multiple extensive letters and faxes to this newspaper, warning us against all kinds of things. I get paid the same for this column whether it takes me two hours or a week. This may go some small way to explaining why you will hear only praise heaped upon Dore in the media.
Dore Program Exercises
Meanwhile the Australian arm of the Dore business has gone into administration, workers are unpaid, and parents are out of pocket. But you will hear nothing about this in the brave British media. This very week, even as everyday folk in Australia were wondering if they would ever see their money again, Radio 4's supposedly investigative consumer programme You and Yours was promoting the Dore programme. And as ever, Kenny Logan was the studio guest. Pay now, up front, for the miracle cure!
Please send your bad science to email@example.com
The Dore programme (or Dore program), named after its creator, businessman Wynford Dore, is a method for improving skills such as reading and writing, attention and focus, social skills and sports performance through targeted physical exercises.
The validity of the program has been disputed, as it has not been subject to any conclusive study that meets the criteria for a randomised controlled trial.
- 2The Dore method
Dore, previously known as DDAT (Dyslexia Dyspraxia Attention Treatment), was initiated by businessman Wynford Dore for his daughter Susie who was diagnosed as severely dyslexic and became depressed and suicidal. After being told that there was no cure for dyslexia, Wynford began working with a team of researchers to investigate Harold Levinson's claim that the cerebellum is linked to the types of symptoms Susie was experiencing. Roy Rutherford, a friend of Wynford's, suggested that an underdeveloped cerebellum may be the cause of Susie's symptoms. The Dore programme was subsequently developed for Susie and, after she began to read and write, then made available to others.
According to a video released by Dore, conditions such as dyslexia, developmental coordination disorder, ADD, Autism, Asperger syndrome and ADHD are linked to cerebellar function. Dore Program Practitioners believe that it is possible to treat difficulties in areas such as reading, attention, coordination, and social skills by developing these neural pathways.
The Dore method
The theory behind the Dore method is that skills such as reading and writing are learned through practice and become automatic because the cerebellum allows the learning process to occur at the maximum rate of efficiency. The Dore method alleges that, as skills become more automatic, the working memory required to perform a task decreases. The Dore Programme aims to stimulate the development of the cerebellum and hence to strengthen the communications between the cerebrum and cerebellum.
The Dore programme stipulates that clients must be 7 years of age or older; younger clients would be more difficult to accurately assess. Adults of all ages are believed to be suitable for Dore.
Dore Programme effectiveness
The effectiveness of the Dore Programme is disputed. The first study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Dore programme was published in Dyslexia in 2003, which reported improvements in writing, reading, and comprehension of 35 school-aged students at Balsall Common School in Warwickshire, UK on standardised testing. Most of the study participants did not have any diagnosed learning difficulties: six had dyslexia, two had developmental coordination disorder and one had ADHD. Some of the remainder were identified as 'at risk' on the basis of the Dyslexia Screening Test, but the majority of children did not have severe difficulties. A follow-up to this study was published in Dyslexia in 2006, and, upon reevaluating the students, the authors report significant improvements in writing, reading, and comprehension, as well as ADHD attention skills.
Studies on efficacy with the target clinical groups have yet to be replicated in a peer-reviewed medical journal, and where control data are available, the evidence of gains in literacy associated with the Dore programme needs to be further validated.
Dore Program Exercises
Wynford Dore Program Exercises To Flattening
Of the treatment
The Dore Programme treatment has been studied and continues to be the subject of further research. The study by Reynolds et al. has been challenged. For example, a control group was included only for a subset of assessments, and not for follow up; little information was provided on the test scores or treatment status of children in the experimental group who were not followed up. The two authors of the research defended it as showing significant and maintained gains in coordination after treatment. A number of papers published in the British Dyslexia Association's journal have found the apparently independent academic research Dore initially offered in support of the treatment to be the subject of some debate. According to an article published in the Times Educational Supplement in 2004, many of Britain's foremost academics maintain that the results need to be replicated.
Into early claims
The UK's Independent Television Commission and Ofcom upheld complaints made about a 2002 news item on British television in which Sir Trevor McDonald hailed DDAT as a 'breakthrough in the treatment of dyslexia.' It repeated this decision about a later item on Richard & Judy, and found a television commercial made by DDAT to be in breach of Advertising Standards Code Rules for creating a false impression of the medical evidence, and implying that professional medical advice and support would be part of the treatment.In all these cases, however, they stated that: 'the ITC does not express, nor does it seek to express, any view whatsoever on DDAT as an organisation or the relative efficacy of its treatment for dyslexia, neither of which was the subject of this finding.' The complaints were mainly about claims that this was new and pioneering research when many elements date back to at least 30 years before the DDAT was founded.
After the British journal Dyslexia published one paper about the Dore programme in 2003, the paper was followed by ten critical commentaries and one commentator resigned from Dyslexia's editorial board.In 2006, five members of the board of directors resigned in protest of the publication of a follow-up article highly favorable of Dore, citing concerns about the methodology used in the study and financial conflicts of interest due to Dore's involvement in funding the research. The editor of Dyslexia defended the decision to publish, and the authors of the original Dore research paper responded vigorously to these criticisms and continued to support their findings and conclusions.
Advertising Standards Authority rules against Dore
In December 2009, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ordered Dore to take down advertisements it posted via Google links that claimed the program offered help for dyslexia, Asperger syndrome, and ADHD developmental coordination disorder. Dore attempted to defend the ads by citing two studies supporting its claims, but the ASA ruled that the advertisements' claims were unsupported by the studies and were misleading.
Wynford Dore Exercises
In May 2008 the DDAT company (Dyslexia Dyspraxia Attention Treatment), went into liquidation in the UK. On 23 January 2009, Dynevor Ltd acquired the intellectual property rights and the assets of the Dore programme from Wynford Dore and CDT Ltd.
- ^Dore, USA. 'Dore USA website'. Archived from the original on 17 November 2013. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
- ^ abReynolds D, Nicolson RI (May 2007). 'Follow-up of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties'. Dyslexia. 13. 13 (2): 78–96. doi:10.1002/dys.331. PMID17557685.
- ^ abBishop DV (2007). 'Curing dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by training motor co-ordination: miracle or myth?'. J Paediatr Child Health. 43 (10): 653–5. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01225.x. PMC2835859. PMID17854448.
- ^Scott, Caroline (March 5, 2006). 'Wynford Dore and his daughter Susie'. The Times. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
- ^Dore, W (2006). Dyslexia: the miracle cure. London: John Blake Publishing.
- ^Yeager, Mark. 'Dore Program Offers Hope for Those Struggling with ADHD, Dyslexia and Other Learning Disabilities'. Dore Program YouTube Video. Retrieved 17 June 2011.
- ^Yeager, Mark. 'A Student's Success Coping With Attention Deficit Disorder Brings Dore to a Mississippi School'. YouTube Public Video. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- ^Dore, USA. 'Dore USA website science explained'. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
- ^Albritton, Jim. 'A Mississippi Author with Attention Deficit Disorder is Writing Again Thanks to the Dore Program'. doreprogram. YouTube. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
- ^'Who is Dore for?'. Your questions answered.. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
- ^ abcdReynolds, D; Nicolson, R.I.; Hambly, H (August 2003). 'Evaluation of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties'. Dyslexia. 9. 9 (3): 164–176. doi:10.1002/dys.257. PMID12940300.
- ^'Ongoing Studies'. Dore Research. dore.co.uk. Archived from the original on 22 September 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
- ^Bishop DV. 'Evaluating alternative solutions for dyslexia'. dysTalk. Retrieved 2009-12-31.
- ^Bishop DV (2007). 'Curing dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by training motor co-ordination: miracle or myth?'. J Paediatr Child Health. 43 (10): 653–5. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01225.x. PMC2835859. PMID17854448.
- ^Bishop DV (2008). 'Criteria for evaluating behavioural interventions for neurodevelopmental disorders'. J Paediatr Child Health. 44 (9): 520–1. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01358.x. PMID18928470.
- ^Reynolds D, Nicolson R (2008). 'Comment on 'Curing dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by training motor co-ordination: miracle or myth?''. J Paediatr Child Health. 44 (9): 521–2. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01359.x. PMID18928471.
- ^Gold K (2004-07-02). 'A remedy without rigour?'. Times Educational Supplement. Retrieved 2009-12-31.
- ^Chris Tregenza (2004-07-06). 'TV Complaints Upheld About DDAT'. Myomancy. Archived from the original on 2006-10-27.
- ^Revell, Phil (07-16-02). 'Balancing act'. London: The Guardian. Retrieved 2010-05-01.Check date values in:
- ^Critical commentaries of Reynolds et al. 2003:
- Miles TR; Peer, L (2003). 'Commentaries on the Reynolds et al. article'. Dyslexia. 9 (2): 122–3. doi:10.1002/dys.250. PMID12775084.
- Peer L; Peer, L (2003). 'Commentary'. Dyslexia. 9 (2): 123–4. doi:10.1002/dys.246. PMID12775084.
- Stein J (2003). 'Evaluation of an exercise based treatment for children with reading difficulties'. Dyslexia. 9 (2): 124–6. doi:10.1002/dys.247. PMID12775085.
- Snowling MJ, Hulme C (2003). 'A critique of claims from Reynolds, Nicolson & Hambly (2003) that DDAT is an effective treatment for children with reading difficulties—'lies, damned lies and (inappropriate) statistics?''(PDF). Dyslexia. 9 (2): 127–33. doi:10.1002/dys.245. PMID12775086. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- Rack J (2003). 'The who, what, why and how of intervention programmes: comments on the DDAT evaluation'. Dyslexia. 9 (3): 137–9. doi:10.1002/dys.255. PMID12940295.
- Hatcher PJ (2003). 'Reading intervention: a 'conventional' and successful approach to helping dyslexic children acquire literacy'. Dyslexia. 9 (3): 140–5. doi:10.1002/dys.254. PMID12940296.
- Richards IL, Moores E, Witton C, et al. (2003). 'Science, sophistry and 'commercial sensitivity': comments on 'Evaluation of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties', by Reynolds, Nicolson and Hambly'. Dyslexia. 9 (3): 146–50. doi:10.1002/dys.258. PMID12940297.
- Singleton C, Stuart M (2003). 'Measurement mischief: a critique of Reynolds, Nicolson and Hambly (2003)'. Dyslexia. 9 (3): 152–60. doi:10.1002/dys.256. PMID12940298.
- McPhillips M (2003). 'A commentary on an article published in the February 2003 edition of 'Dyslexia', 'Evaluation of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties' (Reynolds, Nicolson, & Hambly)'. Dyslexia. 9 (3): 161–3. doi:10.1002/dys.259. PMID12940299.
- Whiteley HE, Pope D (2003). 'Reynolds, D., Nicolson, R. I. and Hambly, H. (2003). Evaluation of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties'. Dyslexia. 9 (3): 164–6. doi:10.1002/dys.257. PMID12940300.
- ^Swinford S (2006-11-26). 'Scientists quit in dyslexia 'cure' row'. Sunday Times. London. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- ^'Archived copy'. Archived from the original on 2014-12-05. Retrieved 2007-05-03.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
- ^EL(3)-09-07 : Paper 2 : Evidence to the Committee on Dyslexia Support in Wales - Professor Angela Fawcett - Director of the Centre for Child Research, Swansea UniversityArchived June 6, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
- ^*Nicolson; Reynolds, David (2003). 'Science, Sense and Syngergy:Response to Commentators article'. Dyslexia. 9 (2): 167–176. doi:10.1002/dys.261.*Nicolson R, Reynolds D (2007). 'Sound Design and balanced Analyses:Response to Rack and Colleagues'. Dyslexia. 13 (2): 105–109. doi:10.1002/dys.337.
- ^ASA ruling on Dore advertisements:
- Symons J (2009-12-17). 'ASA not happy as Dore opens its doors again'. The Sun. Retrieved 2009-12-31.
- 'ASA adjudication on Dynevor Ltd'. Advertising Standards Authority. 2009-12-16. Archived from the original on 2010-02-22. Retrieved 2010-01-05.
- ^Hawkes N (2008-05-29). 'Millionaire Wynford Dore pulls plug on his dyslexia cure'. The Times. London. Retrieved 2008-11-13.
- ^'Couple lost £3,000 after Kenilworth firm went into administration'. Kenilworth Weekly News. 2009-01-29. Retrieved 2009-12-31.
- ^'About Dore & Dynevor'. Dore Official Website. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2011.